Hinson Liberty Tree

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants” –Thomas Jefferson

  • Home
  • Concerning
  • Concessions
  • Convictions
Loading Quotes...

Posts Tagged ‘Obamacare’

Taxpayers Paying For Abortions w/ Fedl $

Thursday, July 15th, 2010

WASHINGTON, D.C., July 13, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) – In the first known instance of direct federal funding of abortion under the new health care legislation, Pennsylvania [received from the federal governmt] $160 million to set up a new “high-risk” insurance program – and [the Obama Administration] quietly approved a plan submitted by an appointee of Governor Edward Rendell (D) under which the new program will cover any abortion that is legal in Pennsylvania.

The high-risk pool program, which will be funded entirely by the federal government, is one of the new programs created by the sweeping health care legislation President Obama signed into law on March 23. The law authorizes $5 billion in federal funds for the program, which will cover as many as 400,000 people when it is implemented nationwide.

Although an earlier version of the health care legislation prevented federal funds from subsidizing abortion, that protection was not included in the bill signed into law. Although the president’s Executive Order regarding funding for abortion was touted as the solution, the White House later admitted the Order simply “reiterated” what was already in the bill.

“This is just the first proof of the phoniness of President Obama’s assurances that federal funds would not subsidize abortion – but it will not be the last,” said Douglas Johnson, legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC).

Details of the high-risk pool plans for most states are not yet available. But on June 28, Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner Joel Ario issued a press release announcing that the federal Department of Health and Human Services had approved his agency’s proposal for implementing the new program in Pennsylvania. According to the release, “The plan’s benefit package will include preventive care, physician services, diagnostic testing, hospitalization, mental health services, prescription medications and much more, with subsidized premiums of $283 a month.”

Examination of the detailed Pennsylvania plan (posted here), reveals that the “much more” will include insurance coverage of any legal abortion.

The section on abortion (see page 14) asserts that “elective abortions are not covered.” However, that statement proves to be a red herring, because the operative language does not define “elective.” Rather, the proposal specifies that the coverage “includes only abortions and contraceptives that satisfy the requirements of” several specific statutes, the most pertinent of which is 18 Pa. C.S. § 3204, which says that an abortion is legal in Pennsylvania (consistent with Roe v. Wade) if a single physician believes that it is “necessary” based on “all factors (physical, emotional, psychological, familial and the woman’s age) relevant to the well-being of the woman.”

Indeed, the cited statute provides only a single circumstance in which an abortion prior to 24 weeks is not permitted under the Pennsylvania statute: “No abortion which is sought solely because of the sex of the unborn child shall be deemed a necessary abortion.”

As a result, “Under the Rendell-Sebelius plan, federal funds will subsidize coverage of abortion performed for any reason, except sex selection,” said NRLC’s Johnson. “The Pennsylvania proposal conspicuously lacks language that would prevent funding of abortions performed as a method of birth control or for any other reason, except sex selection – and the Obama Administration has now approved this.”

Responding to NRLC’s discovery, Tom McClusky, Family Research Council Action’s Senior Vice President, said: “Never have we so regretted being right on an issue, but this $160 million for an abortion insurance program in Pennsylvania validates the arguments FRC Action made throughout the health care debate: Taxpayer dollars will fund abortions. For our efforts to remove the bill’s abortion funding, we were called ‘deceivers’ by President Obama and ‘liars’ by his allies.”

“Now we know who the true deceivers and liars really are.”

Tags: federal funding abortion, gov ed rendell, high-risk pool, lifesitenews.com, Obamacare, pennsylvania
Posted in Uncategorized | 9 Comments »

The “12 Cent” Problem

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

George Will, brilliant fiscal conservative that he is, made the proverbial light bulb go off in my head last week with another great article he produced.  He again addressed the radical changes Obamacare would bring to America if passed by Congress.

I have long thought the Federal Gov’t has no constitutional right to be involved in Health Insurance.  Incrementalism has been the means by which the ideological socialists and world gov’t crowd uses to gain more control over the country and the American people undermining our constitutional republic’s foundations.  Trace the line from the 14th amendment to the Federal Reserve and the Federal Income Tax, to Social Security and on to Medicare and Medicaid.  Bush II added a prescription benefit to Medicare in spite of its expected financial demise by 2016.  Both parties have been involved in the process though the Reconstruction Radical Republicans, Wilson (and Col. House), FDR, and LBJ deserve the harshest criticism.  As a student of History and political science, I made it my business to know all of this.

Gov’t interference in Health Insurance has driven up costs by disrupting the free market of supply and demand in Medical Care.  America Medical Care is the best in the world.  All Americans have access to medical care through doctors, primecare facilities, and hospitals.  Ability to pay is the only prerequisite to higher levels of care. That is where the Left has sold a lie to the masses.  Does everyone drive a Rolls Royce; a Stutz Bearcat; a Ferrari; even a Cadillac or Lincoln TownCar???   No.  Some do; but most drive Chevys and Fords, Chryslers and affordable foreign cars.  A lot of people drive older model cars with high mileage.  What about homes???  Some can afford mansions in gated-communities; most live in average brick ranchers; some rent or live in mobile homes.

People understand the economic laws regarding autos we drive and homes we live in; where do people get the idea medical care is different– that it is some kind of entitlement we deserve in our quest to live forever.  That is where Will came in last week.  David Gratzer of the Manhattan Institute calls Employer-paid Insurance the “12 cent problem”.  Only 12 cents of every dollar spent on health care is spent by the person receiving the care.  “Hence”, Will says, “Americans buffet mentality– we paid at the door to the health-care feast, so let’s consume all we can.”

That is where the light bulb went off for me.  Get the Federal gov’t out of our health care system– yes.  Folks who have paid into Medicare should get its benefits, but it is going to go broke sometime soon.  Announce an end to the program and let young people begin looking for private sector alternatives.  Pay out as best as possible the generation that has paid into it.   States should cut Medicaid benefits 25- 40 % over a five year period.  The middle-age crowd (which I belong to ) has no right to hide their parents assets so the state can pick up the bill to pay for those aging parents’ care.  The elderly are not so special that they get to pass on their medical care bills to the next generation.

Next, and simultaneously, wean Employer-paid Health Insurance out of the economic marketplace.  Companies could cease providing insurance coverage for new hires effective at a new year.  They could then drop coverage as employees retire or pass away.  They could provide a 2yr window to allow current employees to find private sector coverage.  Private contractors (I sold insurance for 6 yrs and was a private contractor) and small business owners have always bought private sector coverage for themselves and their families.

Wages would increase with the weaning away of employer paid health insurance.  If the masses pay the full cost of health care, their eyes would be opened and demand could force changes to costs of coverage.  Healthcare providers see Uncle Sam as having bottomless pockets, but the average consumer has limits to their ability to pay.  This proposed remedy is not w/o pain. But, the current system is unsustainable; and the Obamacare solution is profoundly worse. It is more socialistic, more dictatorial, and will result in greater amounts of rationing of care. It is anathema when compared to the constitutional foundations of our republic and free market capitalis economic system.  Change must start somewhere but not what Congress is proposing currently.

Tags: 12 cent problem, David Gratzer, George Will, Government Healthcare Reform, health insurance, Manhattan Institute, Obamacare
Posted in Uncategorized | 27 Comments »

Something to think about…

Thursday, September 17th, 2009

The United Kingdom Health Service is the world’s 3rd largest employer. At #2, India’s National Rail System; and at #1, The Army of Communist Red China. Think about the populations of China and India. How many trains must run in India?

China’s army as a percentage of their population must make it huge. Then think about the small island nation of Great Britain. Their Health Service ranks third in employees among companies around the world. How is that for cost efficiency? Is this something America wants to emulate?

Tags: Government Healthcare Reform, Obamacare, public option, socialized medicine
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Social Security Completely Depleted By 2037

Monday, September 14th, 2009

You do not have to go to Fox News or Rush Limbaugh to find out how incompetent the Federal Government is at managing current social programs in order to make a more educated decision on a future Government- run Health Care System.  Since the middle of August, several articles have been put out by the AP and Scripps Howard warning Americans about “daunting and dangerous challenges” bearing down on federal programs.

An Associated Press story compared Social Security to a giant Ponzi scheme like that of Bernie Madoff.  Social Security takes contributions for current workers to pay benefits for retirees. The scheme worked great when the ratio of workers to retirees was 16:1.  That produced a massive surplus in funds which was wrongfully used to “finance the rest of the government.”   As Baby Boomers have started reaching retirement age, the ratio has been whittled to 6:1.  With increased life expectancy for seniors, a continuing decrease in American childbirths (not to mention 1 million annual abortions since 1973), “the day of reckoning is fast approaching.”

“We had a remarkable 25-year run in terms of the economy.  We had this wonderful demographic holiday where the baby boomers were moving through their main earning years.  Now, the economy is in tatters, the boomers are ready to retire,

the world is sick of our debt.  The problems are much bigger”, William Gale, co-director of the Tax Policy Center says.

Trustees of the system forecast money paid out in benefits will exceed tax dollars flowing in by 2016.  “With no changes, Social Security will be completely depleted in 2037, according to trustees.”   The story goes on to say Medicare is in even worse shape.  The government health care plan designed to cover seniors and handicapped Americans has been “paying out more than it takes in since last year and is projected to go insolvent in 2017.”

Recently, the President undermined his own argument concerning greater competitive efficiency with a Government option in health care insurance coverage at a town hall meeting in Colorado.  He compared the success of UPS and Fed Ex with the problems suffered by the the US Postal Service.  John M Crisp, of the Scripps Howard News Service, reiterated this in an August 13 story.  “The handwriting is on the wall of the local post office… the US Postal Service is probably on its way out.”

The USPS had a $7 billion deficit in 2008; it faces one of the same size for 2009.  With mail volume down, due to increased internet use for communicating and paying bills, almost 700 local post offices have been selected for closure.  Increasing postage rates has failed to staunch the bleeding.  Time will tell whether the USPS survives as a federal institution.

In light of the well documented failure of current federal social programs such as Social Security and Medicare, state programs like Medicaid, and federal departments like the Postal Service and Amtrak, should the American people trust the Government to design a socialized health care system which will come to control 1/6 of the entire US economy?  With the evidence put forth by a variety of sources, the answer must be a resounding “No”.

Tags: Fox news, government-run healthcare, medicare, Obamacare, public option, Rush, social security
Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments »

  • Categories

    • Uncategorized (38)
  • Archives

    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
  • Links of Interest

    • American Conservative Party
    • Americans For Prosperity
    • Christian Heritage Ministries
    • Civitas
    • Heritage Foundation
    • John Birch Society
    • John Locke Foundation
    • North Carolina Division, SCV
    • Patrick Buchanan
    • Smart Girl Politics
    • Steve Forbes

Copyright © 2010 - Hinson Liberty Tree | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS)

Greensboro Web Design by Ashley Bailey Designs, LCC